Socrates and Plato - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 3 Words: 835 Downloads: 10 Date added: 2019/08/08 Category People Essay Tags: Socrates Essay Did you like this example? According to the University of Florida, In a broad sense, philosophy is an activity people undertake when they seek to understand fundamental truths about themselves, the world in which they live, and their relationships to the world and to each other. (FSU, Department of Philosophy). It is defined as the love of wisdom. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Socrates and Plato" essay for you Create order In simpler words, it is the way that a person may think about the world or universe (spirit, and mind), and what it is made up of to understand the mystery of existence. It is thinking about thinking. The subject of philosophy is so arguable so the term isnt exactly be defined. There are many philosophers that have many different views and opinions on philosophy. In the western tradition, prehistoric philosophy and belief was produced and arose from philosophers such as Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, Thales, Anaximander, and etc. A great deal of greek philosophers were important, and many things that they have said are still said the same, or in a rephrased state today. For example, Socrates said, The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing. This has been rephrased by my grandmother as the fool in the room always makes the most noise. Many of those believers ideas are still accepted today throughout many different countries and religions. Out of all of the philosophers, I believe that the philosophers who have made the most significant differences are Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle. Their thoughts and beliefs are similar yet different, and are still accepted in modern society all over. From this course I have learned that you couldnt really study or learn the world of philosophy without bringing up those three philosophers. According to the Ancient History Encyclopedia, Socrates was a Greek philosopher and is considered the father of western philosophy. Plato was his most famous student and would teach Aristotle who would then tutor Alexander the Great.(Mark, Joshua). Socrates lived from four hundred sixty nine BCE to three hundred ninety nine BCE. In my opinion, he is one of the most powerful and persuasive Greek philosophers. He created the method of elenchus, which is also known as the socratic method. This method is an open space where someone or a group of people can sit and ask open ended questions about a topic to unfold a better, more deeper understanding. It is a system of thinking where for example, a person asks a question in a study group. After the question is presented, the rest of the circle goes around, one at a time answering the same question. It simply works by breaking down big problems, into smaller, less complicated problems. Biology.com states that, Socratess life is chronicled through only a few sources†the dialogues of Plato and Xenophon and the plays of Aristophanes. The writings were not really written to report his life, and none showed a true image of what actually happened. Even-so, they give of a different and clear picture what of Socrates personality and philosophy was like. According to Plato, a just person can be related to a just society; both of them function similarly as a whole. Social justice occurs when each member of society plays the role for which his nature best suits him. Individual or moral justice occurs when the individual is harmonizing and keep all factors of his being in balance. Platos view of a just society and a just individual is the aspiration for the gain of the whole over the individual. All of these ideas ties together Platos ideal republic. Plato claims that justice occurs when all three parts of the whole performs their legitimate functions. Plato carried on Socrates unique approach to philosophy and extended it one step farther. He expanded largely on Socrates works on immortality of the soul, truth, the existence of man on two planes, and why, only after death, one could see truth more clearly in one of his most acclaimed works, the Doctrine of Pure Form and Ideas. The doctrine of pure form and ideas illustrated how man was deceived by his senses and that they masked the real truth. In fact, Plato argued that a man would see a horse for example, in a whole new light after death, because only then could he see the pure form after the mask of his mortal senses was lifted. Furthermore, he believed that a pure form, in other words an essence that can see all for its genuine truth created the world, which many consider the true beginning of monotheism. On the other end of the spectrum are his political contributions, whereby he took Socrates criticism of democracy to a new level. Plato Originally, the term philosophy related to any structure of knowledge or recognition. Works Cited Mark, Joshua J. Socrates. Ancient History Encyclopedia, Ancient History Encyclopedia, 6 Dec. 2018, www.ancient.eu/socrates/. Timmons, Greg. Socrates. Biography.com, AE Networks Television, 28 Apr. 2017, www.biography.com/people/socrates-9488126. University, Florida. Department of Philosophy. What Is Philosophy?, 2018, philosophy.fsu.edu/undergraduate-study/why-philosophy/What-is-Philosophy.

The Death Of A Beloved Creature - 1525 Words

Silence Gliding through the water, so gracefully. Happy as can be with no care in the world. The water so calm and serene with all the different hues of blue, reflecting the bright blue sky. Near the shore it was pale blue, nearly translucent, and as its depth became eternal it changed from pale blue to a deep sapphire. The trees on the far side of the lake were mirrored within, the leaves fraught with color; and as the lake rippled, they seemed to dance with a passion all their own. Until, a disturbance arose. The death of a beloved creature. Too abrupt. She was young and beautiful. She was the embodiment of every ideal and every principle. She was unusual. Authentic and true. With a gray ¬brown head and a brownish, green crest.†¦show more content†¦The fact of trash being everywhere provides an endangerment for wildlife in urban areas due to habitat destruction. The ruining on wildlife’s habitat means that they easily can get killed by some of the many dangerous items of litter that is pretty much everywhere. With that much amount of littering going to trash, you can literally understand how much litter there really is, and how much dangerous items there honestly could be out there to potentially harm animals. With all that money to pick up billions of dollars’ worth of trash you can see how a seemingly small problem like littering really is, and know how much of a massively important problem that littering really is. The amount of resources it takes to fix this problem is heartbreaking. That could be going to schools, reconstruction, the economy, new technology, and the bettering of the community. That one or couple pieces of trash that fall is all it takes for an innocent animal walking by to eat, or try to put its head in and get killed in a matter of mere minutes. A glass bottle that falls out will shatter and an animal walking by can eat glass and die a gruesome and agitating death. A wrapper can easily be swallow whole by an animal only to be stuck in its throat to slowly choke away, by a seemingly non ¬dangerous item. It is amazing how a small amount of litter and all the dangerous it can cause in an environment. There are some many places it can come from too. People

Discursive Essay free essay sample

Discursive Essay Cosmetic surgery is not widely available on the NHS. Only in certain situations do the NHS pay for cosmetic procedures, but where should the line be drawn between cosmetic surgery necessary and beneficial and people using it because of physcological reasons. The NHS spend around ? 5. 7million on giving people surgery, should costs be cut or rules be tighter. Only on rare occasions do the NHS pay for cosmetic surgery, only if it is required to protect someone’s health. For those with facial disfigurement it would be very difficult to feel ‘normal’ or comfortable with themselves. It seems fair procedures like removement off a faicial birthmark or congenital condition or disfigurement cause by illness or injury to be free on the NHS. People with this kind of problem simply cant help it, and may not have the money to spend on surgery. People in these situations must feel deeply grateful for the NHS’s payments. It would also benefit the government as they would not have to give out unnecessary benefits to people who should not have children. Though in saying this the person that would benefit from stopping teenage pregnancy would be the child itself. No child would want to grow up in slum conditions within a scheme, this being where the majority of underage mothers hail from. Going by some of these would be mothers lives the baby would be better off unborn than to grow up in a community such a scheme. Though with the help of local health clinics and general practitioners it has been proven that in some case of the pill being handed out there have been more pregnancies because of it. The reason being, it encourages the teens to have sex at the age they are at. Why you ask? It encourages them because it allows them to have sex without the worry of getting pregnant. Though at that age kids won’t have a clue on how to use it properly. This put a huge question hovering over the government. Is making the pill easier to acquire for young girls the best idea to cut teenage pregnancy down? Probably not now those studies have found that it can raise pregnancy in teens higher than without it. Though the government has told school nurses to issue the morning after pill to teenage students across the nation in an attempt to tackle teenage pregnancy. This has caused an outrage in parents everywhere as the schools have done this without consulting them first. Some parents asked about this situation have been very angry about the whole thing and have even contacted the police as some of the schools have said they had not known about the situation until they were alerted by it in the news. This is not the case for all of the parents as they said it would be a good idea as long as it has a good outcome. The only thing that bothered this group of parents was that the schools did not run it by them first. Dr David Paton, an economist at Nottingham University Business School, studied records of how many under-16s became pregnant and how many visited family planning clinics in 16 UK regions over a 14-year period. In particular, Dr Paton studied the impact of the case brought by morality campaigner Victoria Gillick in the mid-1980s, in which a court ruled that doctors should tell parents if they gave contraceptives to under-age girls. He found that a year after, the number of teenage girls attending family planning clinics had dropped by a huge margin. This ruling was opposed by many as it was said to increase many teenage pregnancies. Dr Paton said â€Å"Although family planning may make sexually active teenagers less likely to get pregnant, it seems that it also encourages others to start having sex. † His view on it was the same as many and pointed out the fact that the pill can create many more pregnant teenagers. Other doctors are saying giving out pill to schools is a great idea but only as a wide programme. If they are given out to one girl at a time then the girls might not know what to do properly or might not want to talk to their friends about it. So the doctors are advising the schools taking part in the scheme to get the teenage girls to take part in a programme that would them know what taking the pill is about. This gives the girls a chance to ask questions without being embarrassed, to talk to their friends about it and to take the pill properly if needed. Though again it brings up the main fear that easier access to the pill will lead to increased promiscuity in young girls. This is because these schemes are giving girls as young as thirteen a licence to take part in illegal sexual intercourse instead of the protection of the law that the age of consent is there to give. Issuing the pill to underage girls would be a terrible idea as it would probably lead to more underage mothers across the nation. Not only this but it would end up creating incongruous girls that have barely just learnt how to do their multiplication tables. Not handing out the pill in schools would stop underage pregnancies and would mean the child would not have to grow up with poor help from the underage mothers.

Systems thinking Developing Solutions to Sustainability Challenges

Question: Discuss about the Systems thinking Developing Solutions to Sustainability Challenges. Answer: Sustainability challenges hinder the use of balanced approaches of runningbusiness operations as well as economic affairs. Systems thinking plays an important role in the success of an organization by maintaining growth, development, and sustainability in the industry ad business environment (Mingers and White, 2010, p.1150). Managers in different firms have embraced different methods of solving problems. These methods have not provided any notable solutions that can help to solve challenges concerning sustainability. These complex problems have only been addressed through the adoption of systems thinking technique of solving sustainability challenges. After understanding the complex system, a manager has a better opportunity of developing a better solution to address the challenges facing the firm in the industry. Wicked problems such as increasing womens participation in senior executive roles in Australian corporations have been a distracter to sustainability of companies in diffe rent sectors, both the private and public industry and systems thinking remains to be the perfect technique of resolving this issue. Discrimination challenges kind prevent Australia from achieving its full potential and acts as a huge reason behind their failure to develop a critical solutions of solving sustainability challenges. The essay is based on the agreement that adopting systems thinking helps in coming up with critical solutions that can be used to tackle sustainability challenges, and in particular lack of women participation in development projects. This is because systems thinking concepts have helped and contributed a lot in integrating and exploring new ideas in other great nations and firms (Nguyen and Bosch, 2013, p.110). These ideas will help the corporation or the nation to be more competitive as they will learn new ways of production which can make their products more improved than before and this will assist them to be able to kick out rival companies out of business. These ideas also help an organization to grow as it will have a larger market for its products and services. This step will enable the firm to command a larger market share, and this will result in more sales which in turn leads to more profit which can be invested in trying to develop critical solutions to sustainability cha llenges. The purpose of this essay is to show how adopting systems thinking can help to solve problems that may cripple our globe's economy. Rebranding or repackaging has been influenced by systems thinking. This has enabled organizations to create products which are more improved, and this will help to attract more customers. Customer loyalty which is one of the most sought things in business organizations will be achieved. This rebranding helps firms to positions their products in a place that is high position than those of their competitors, and this enables the organization to have more sales which encourage businesses to expand to international markets or even e-commerce so that they can have a market for their products. This helps organizations to develop solutions that solve sustainability challenges (Nguyen and Bosch, 2013, p.110). Systems thinking creates a more appealing vision of the future. This helps firms to have a well-defined vision which enables organizations to achieve their clearly set objectives and goals more effectively and efficiently. This vision enables companies to direct all their resources and energy towards the achievement of the well-set goals. According to the many managers I have had contact with, this vision saves the firm a lot of resources as it helps to avoid wastage of resources and the protected resources can be re-invested elsewhere so as to help achieve the main aims of the organisation, hence contributing to solving sustainability challenges (Mai, 2010, p.11 ). Systems thinking approach helps organizations to understand and solve complex problems. First, systems thinking enables managers to analyze the complex problems and understand their causes so that they may come up with the most efficient methods of solving various problems more efficiently. This will enable the organization to achieve its objectives because the first step towards healing is to understand the problem. By doing so, the managers will be able to develop solutions to sustainable challenges (Mingers and White, 2010, p.1150 ). Systems thinking can help to design new systems. This will help the firm to have more creative and innovative structures for performing various tasks in the organization. This makes production to be more efficient. This in return helps the team to save on consumption of resources. The new systems enable the firm to produce their products and services with minimum wastage which causes the firms to have lower production costs. By achieving lower production costs, the corporation is in a better position to sell its products and services at a lower price. This translates to increased demand for the firm's commodities which aids in avoiding sustainability challenges such as stiff competition (Best and Holmes, 2010, p.150 ). Systems thinking can help to provide a better way of creating strategies and making sound decisions. These policies and decisions benefit corporations in many nations to come up with very helpful methods of how to tackle sustainability challenges without forgetting to fulfill their core course of existence which is to achieve their goals and objectives. The core missions of many businesses are to create value, control a larger market share, make more profit and the most important one being to increase shareholders value. With the use of systems thinking businesses can achieve these goals and still be able to help develop critical solutions to sustainability challenges (Jackson,2010, p.135 ). Through the adoption of systems thinking, many organizations will be able to deal well with change. Change is one of the things which cannot be avoided in businesses as it can be caused by various factors. The change may occur due to the following factors which include a shift in tax rates, economic changes and even change of legal regulations and structures. For any business to cope well with these changes, it will have to adopt systems thinking which will enable it to come up with various options and alternatives which can be taken if the business wants to flourish and stay competitive. This helps the firm be able to develop critical solutions to sustainability challenges and promote sustainability development for better economic conditions (Jackson, 2010, p.135 ). Even after agreeing that systems thinking can be of much help when tackling sustainability challenges, it also has few drawbacks which no one in his/her sound mind can fail to notice. One of the drawbacks is that systems thinking concepts are very complicated and comprehensive. This forces its users to seek further training as it only offers many less useful options. It does not provide details on how these many options can be achieved or attained. Failure to provide straight forward solutions forced many corporations to seek other methods of solving this challenge of sustainability which is forcing many nation's economies to be stagnant (Goh, Brown, Spickett, 2010, p.307). Systems thinking as a way of providing a solution to sustainable challenges requires a firm to invest a substantial amount of resources in it. In simple words, the cost of adopting systems thinking is unbearable by many states. This is because for systems thinking to work effectively as expected, it requires technological structures to be set up and this is very costly. Many managers fail to possess the needed skills and knowledge to make good use of this systems thinking concepts, and this means they require training which is also very expensive (Flood, 2010,p.180 ). This has caused many organizations to be reluctant in adopting this way of solving sustainability challenges as it may cause them to divert their valuable resources to this systems thinking and this may prevent them from achieving their goals and objectives. This wicked problem of increasing women participation in senior executive roles in Australian corporations can be addressed by adopting systems thinking. This will enable many companies in Australia and even in other nations to achieve their goal and objectives more efficiently and effective. Women attend same schools as men, and in my opinion, they should not be denied chances of heading large enterprises like men because this is discrimination by gender. Using systems thinking will enable corporations to realize that organizational practices have changed. Courts in Australia have decided to invest more resources in cases that involve women discrimination, and they are working tirelessly to ensure that no single female faces employment discrimination (Davidson and Burke, 2011, p.280). By doing so, many women have been able to assume top seats in many organizations in Australia, and this has enabled them to grow in different ways. This is because many women are more suited to lead so me companies better than men can do due to various reasons such as better understanding of the business. Australian NGOs and corporations are also advocating for equal employment opportunities. This has encouraged many women to apply for top jobs in large enterprises and at the end of the day, they end up securing the jobs and do pretty well. This change of organizational practices has enabled many firms to be able to solve some sustainability challenges (Clarke, 2011, p. 500). By embracing systems thinking, many companies will realize that leadership role have evolved and changed. This means that the stereotype that only men can head corporations has changed and no one in his/her right senses can still believe it. This shift has created a more conducive environment where women can pursue their dreams without fear of if they will make it to the top seats. This change in leadership roles has caused many firms to accept the fact that women can also head big corporations and perform like men and even outsmart them. Embracing this change has enabled companies to grow to greater heights and also in a better position to solve sustainability challenges (Davidson and Burke, 2011, p.280). Embracing systems thinking enables organizations to realize that women have changed in various ways. One of the ways is that women are investing most of their time not in domestic roles but paid labor. This has enabled many women to pursue their dreams which had been shattered by domestic chores. By doing so, women have been able to work in different organizations which have enabled them to gain the relevant experience which is needed to lead big corporations in Australia. This has provided many women with an opportunity to head big firms in Australia as employers have realized that even women have what it takes to propel these big companies so that they can achieve their goals such as sustainability (Branson, 2011, p.793). In conclusion, systems thinking should be adopted by all managers in all corporations. This is because apart from helping companies understand their complex structures and systems, it also helps in providing alternatives that can help it run more efficiently, help it to be more innovative and creative, help it design new systems and even help it go through the process of change. Systems thinking without no doubt is one of the methods if there is any other that can help corporations be able to develop critical solutions to sustainability challenges. References Ackoff, R.L., Addison, H.J., Gharajedaghi, J. and Carey, A., 2010. Systems thinking for curious managers: With 40 new management laws. Triarchy Press Limited. and Action Research, 23(4), pp.269-284. Best, A. and Holmes, B., 2010. Systems thinking, knowledge and action: towards better models and methods. Evidence Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 6(2), pp.145-159. Branson, D.M., 2011. Initiatives to place women on corporate boards of directors-a global snapshot. J. Corp. L., 37, p.793. Clarke, M., 2011. Advancing women's careers through leadership development programs. Employee Relations, 33(5), pp.498-515. Davidson, M.J. and Burke, R.J. eds., 2011. Women in management worldwide (Vol. 2). Aldershot: Gower. Flood, R.L., 2010. The relationship of systems thinkingto action research. Systemic Practice Galbreath, J., 2011. Are there gender-related influences on corporate sustainability? A study of women on boards of directors. Journal of Management Organization, 17(01), pp.17-38. Goh, Y.M., Brown, H., and Spickett, J., 2010. Applying systems thinking concepts in the analysis of major incidents and safety culture. Safety Science, 48(3), pp.302-309. Jackson, M.C., 2010. Reflections on the development and contribution of critical systems thinking and practice. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 27(2), pp.133-139. Kaplan, A.M. and Haenlein, M., 2010. Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business Horizons, 53(1), pp.59-68. Mai, T.V., 2010, August. Systems thinking approach as a unique tool for sustainable tourism development: A case study in the Cat Ba Biosphere Reserve of Vietnam. In Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the ISSS-2010, Waterloo, Canada (Vol. 54, No. 1). Matsa, D.A. and Miller, A.R., 2013. A female style in corporate leadership? Evidence from Quotas. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 5(3), pp.136-69. Mingers, J. and White, L., 2010. A review of the recent contribution of systems thinking to operational research and management science. European Journal of Operational Research, 207(3), pp.1147-1161. Nguyen, N.C. and Bosch, O.J., 2013. Systems thinking approach to identify leverage points for sustainability: a case study in the Cat Ba Biosphere Reserve, Vietnam. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 30(2), pp.104-115. Nguyen, N.C. and Bosch, O.J., 2013. Systems thinking approach to identify leverage points for sustainability: a case study in the Cat Ba Biosphere Reserve, Vietnam. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 30(2), pp.104-115. Swanson, R.C., Cattaneo, A., Bradley, E., Chunharas, S., Atun, R., Abbas, K.M., Katsaliaki, K., Mustafee, N., Meier, B.M. and Best, A., 2012. Rethinking health systems strengthening: key systems thinking tools and strategies for transformational change. Health policy and planning, 27(Suppl 4), pp.iv54-iv61. White, K., Carvalho, T. and Riordan, S., 2011. Gender, power, and managerialism in universities. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 33(2), pp.179-188. Wiek, A., Withycombe, L., and Redman, C.L., 2011. Key competencies in sustainability: a reference framework for academic program development. Sustainability Science, 6(2), pp.203-218.